AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › IT operations and endpoint › EA tools › Ardoq vs Archi
Enterprise architecture tools · October 2026 Edition

Ardoq vs Archi

Three of fourteen models named Ardoq first on the direct prompt; zero named Archi. Ardoq was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Archi by eleven and Ardoq carries 47 labels and Archi 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Ardoq

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Archi

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share18%11%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate15%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels4714A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Ardoq reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.SAP LeanIX was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. SAP LeanIX vs Ardoq · SAP LeanIX vs Archi · Ardoq vs LeanIX

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the enterprise architecture tools page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ArdoqFirst choices, of fourteen modelsArchi
Direct30
Paraphrase20
Comparative20
Budget-constrained062 against Ardoq
Scale-constrained50
Negative005 against Ardoq
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Ardoq and Archi were named in the same answer twenty-nine times, of the 145 answers naming Ardoq and the 55 naming Archi. In those answers Archi took the first choice eight times and Ardoq six.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Ardoq and Archi stood in it.
ModelDirectARParaphraseARComparativeARBudget-constrainedARScale-constrainedARNegativeAR
Claude Haiku 4.5ARAR
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 FlashAR
Perplexity SonarAR
Grok 4.1 FastAR
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 FlashAR
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 FlashAR
Kimi K2AR
GLM 4.7 FlashXAR
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 LunaAR
Muse Glimmer 30BAR
ArdoqAR Archi first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Ardoq on the left and Archi on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Ardoq and Archi stood in it.

Ardoq first, Archi an alternative

3 of 14 modelsArchi was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Ardoq, LeanIX alternatives: Archi, Bizzdesign Horizzon
MiniMax M2.5Ardoq, SAP LeanIX alternatives: Essential Cloud, Sparx Enterprise Architect
Muse Glimmer 30BArdoq alternatives: Bizzdesign Horizzon, SAP LeanIX, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Neither was the first choice, one was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashSAP LeanIX alternatives: Ardoq, Orbus Software, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Perplexity SonarLeanIX alternatives: Ardoq, Sparx Enterprise Architect
Grok 4.1 FastSAP LeanIX alternatives: Ardoq, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Mistral SmallSparx Systems Enterprise Architect alternatives: Ardoq, iServer365
DeepSeek V4 FlashSAP LeanIX alternatives: Ardoq, Bizzdesign Horizzon, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Qwen 3.7 FlashLeanIX alternatives: Ardoq, Bizzdesign Horizzon, Sparx Systems
Kimi K2SAP LeanIX alternatives: Ardoq, Avolution ABACUS, Bizzdesign Enterprise Studio, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
GLM 4.7 FlashXSAP LeanIX alternatives: Ardoq, Bizzdesign Horizzon, Sparx Enterprise Architect
GPT-6 LunaSAP LeanIX alternatives: Ardoq, OrbusInfinity

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniSAP LeanIX alternatives: Bizzdesign Horizzon, Orbus Software, Sparx Systems
Llama 4 MaverickSparx

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Archi leads by twelve points.
Archi20%#1 of 12
Ardoq8%#4 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Ardoq leads at mid-market.
Ardoq18%#2 of 10
Archi11%#4 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Ardoq leads by twenty-one points.
Ardoq21%#2 of 11
Archi0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Ardoq

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid high-end tools like LeanIX, Bizzdesign, or Ardoq” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“High Risk: Pricing/Packaging Changes ... Ardoq if you have a very large application portfolio (>1,000 apps) and budget sensitivity.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Ardoq is an example often flagged for this: ... exclusively a cloud-hosted SaaS platform — there is no on-premises deployment option” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Dynamic visualization & linking complex relationships. Very user-friendly for non-architects. | Great for "living repository" approach.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Ardoq is the most cited "modern" option for teams that want browser-based real-time collaboration and automated dependency mapping.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“LeanIX and Ardoq are usually the strongest fits because they prioritize portfolio views, impact analysis, and change planning” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Archi

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“For the most budget-conscious approach, Archi is an excellent starting point due to its simplicity, active community, and zero cost.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“If your budget is truly limited, Archi (the free, open‑source ArchiMate editor) is still the best starting point for most companies.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“If you need absolutely no cost and can work desktop-based, Archi is the standard starting point.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.