Zero of fourteen models named openDCIM first on the direct prompt; two named Sunbird dcTrack. openDCIM was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Sunbird dcTrack by eight and openDCIM carries 23 labels and Sunbird dcTrack 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data center infrastructure management page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, openDCIM and Sunbird dcTrack were named in the same answer twenty times, of the 79 answers naming openDCIM and the 52 naming Sunbird dcTrack. In those answers Sunbird dcTrack took the first choice two times and openDCIM five.
| Model | DirectOPSD | ParaphraseOPSD | ComparativeOPSD | Budget-constrainedOPSD | Scale-constrainedOPSD | NegativeOPSD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | OP | OP | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | OP | OP | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | SD | OPSD | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | SD | OPSD | OP | OPSD | ||
| Mistral Small | OP | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | SD | OPSD | OPSD | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | SD | OP | SD | SD | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | SD | OP | OPSD | OPSD | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | OP | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | SD | OP | OP | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | SD | OP | OP |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Best for simple inventory tracking only — not for serious production-grade DCIM needs.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Open-source alternatives like OpenDCIM, NetBox, and RackTables provide core functionality without licensing fees but require more technical expertise to implement” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“I’d avoid relying on it for critical operations unless you’re prepared to maintain a fork or have a credible support plan.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Opendcim is the strongest fit if your company mainly needs basic rack elevation and asset tracking” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“openDCIM is strongly recommended as it offers core DCIM functionality without any licensing costs” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“the most pragmatic choice today is openDCIM—a free, open‑source DCIM application” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Affordable entry at ~$19.50/cabinet/month (published pricing), but not free” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“cited as leading as the most comprehensive choice, offering real-time monitoring, capacity planning, asset management, and workflow automation” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“the top recommendation for a mid-market organization that needs a balance of cost, scalability, and operational depth is Sunbird dcTrack” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Sunbird dcTrack if you want a broad, mature DCIM suite with strong coverage across core DCIM functions.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.