AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Network and edge › NAC › OPSWAT MetaAccess vs Aruba ClearPass
Network access control · October 2026 Edition

OPSWAT MetaAccess vs Aruba ClearPass

One of fourteen models named OPSWAT MetaAccess first on the direct prompt; one named Aruba ClearPass. OPSWAT MetaAccess was named by seven of the fourteen models and Aruba ClearPass by eleven and OPSWAT MetaAccess carries 12 labels and Aruba ClearPass 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.

OPSWAT MetaAccess

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Aruba ClearPass

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share7%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%43%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels1221A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, OPSWAT MetaAccess reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Portnox Cloud was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Portnox Cloud vs OPSWAT MetaAccess · Portnox Cloud vs Aruba ClearPass · PacketFence vs OPSWAT MetaAccess

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the network access control page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OPSWAT MetaAccessFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAruba ClearPass
Direct111 against Aruba ClearPass
Paraphrase20
Comparative00
Budget-constrained103 against Aruba ClearPass
Scale-constrained001 against Aruba ClearPass
Negative004 against Aruba ClearPass
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, OPSWAT MetaAccess and Aruba ClearPass were named in the same answer eight times, of the 26 answers naming OPSWAT MetaAccess and the 79 naming Aruba ClearPass. In those answers Aruba ClearPass took the first choice zero times and OPSWAT MetaAccess one.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where OPSWAT MetaAccess and Aruba ClearPass stood in it.
ModelDirectOMParaphraseOMComparativeOMBudget-constrainedOMScale-constrainedOMNegativeOM
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 FastOMOM
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 MaverickOMOM
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashXOM
MiniMax M2.5OMOMOM
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30BOM
OM OPSWAT MetaAccess Aruba ClearPassOM first choiceOM named as an alternativeOM argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, OPSWAT MetaAccess on the left and Aruba ClearPass on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where OPSWAT MetaAccess and Aruba ClearPass stood in it.

OPSWAT MetaAccess first, Aruba ClearPass not the choice

1 of 14 modelsAruba ClearPass was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Llama 4 MaverickOPSWAT MetaAccess alternatives: Portnox Cloud

Aruba ClearPass first, OPSWAT MetaAccess not the choice

1 of 14 modelsOPSWAT MetaAccess was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniAruba ClearPass alternatives: Cisco Identity Services Engine, FortiNAC, Portnox Cloud

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.1 FastPortnox CLEAR alternatives: OPSWAT MetaAccess
DeepSeek V4 FlashPortnox CLEAR, Portnox Cloud alternatives: Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC
MiniMax M2.5Portnox Cloud alternatives: HPE Aruba ClearPass, Ivanti Policy Secure, OPSWAT MetaAccess

Neither was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Cloudflare One, Jamf Zero Trust alternatives: Fortinet FortiGate, Microsoft Entra ID
Gemini 3.5 FlashPortnox Cloud alternatives: Fortinet FortiNAC, HPE Aruba ClearPass, macmon NAC
Perplexity SonarPortnox Cloud alternatives: Forescout, Fortinet FortiNAC, HPE Aruba ClearPass
Mistral SmallPortnox CLEAR alternatives: Cisco ISE, Fortinet FortiNAC
Qwen 3.7 FlashPortnox CLEAR alternatives: Cisco Identity Services Engine, HPE Aruba ClearPass
Kimi K2Portnox CLEAR alternatives: FortiNAC
GLM 4.7 FlashXPortnox Cloud alternatives: HPE Aruba ClearPass, Ivanti Policy Secure
GPT-6 LunaPortnox Cloud alternatives: Cisco ISE, FortiNAC, HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass
Muse Glimmer 30BOPSWAT MetaAccess / MetaDefender NAC, Portnox CLEAR

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Aruba ClearPass leads by two points.
Aruba ClearPass5%#3 of 9
OPSWAT MetaAccess4%#4 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: OPSWAT MetaAccess leads at mid-market.
OPSWAT MetaAccess7%#3 of 10
Aruba ClearPass2%#4 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
OPSWAT MetaAccess is not named for this buyer.
Aruba ClearPass6%#5 of 7
OPSWAT MetaAccess—not named
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about OPSWAT MetaAccess

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Portnox Cloud or OPSWAT MetaAccess give you device profiling, posture enforcement and guest/BYOD without standing up dedicated appliances.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“OPSWAT MetaAccess - Cited as one of the most accessible entries for small organizations” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“The best network access control solution for a mid-market B2B company is OPSWAT MetaAccess” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Aruba ClearPass

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“What to Avoid - Cisco ISE and Aruba ClearPass – While excellent solutions, they are typically expensive and complex” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Cisco/Aruba/Forescout – these are enterprise-priced” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Support ticket resolution delays; challenging to identify responsible support teams; additional costs for maintenance and regional service” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best overall: Aruba ClearPass” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Aruba ClearPass for multi-vendor flexibility with mature policy capabilities” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · alternative
“ClearPass is famous for its flexibility and ability to handle complex BYOD” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.