Ten of fourteen models named Cloudflare first on the direct prompt; one named Imperva DDoS Protection. Cloudflare was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Imperva DDoS Protection by thirteen and Cloudflare carries 69 labels and Imperva DDoS Protection 43, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the ddos protection page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Cloudflare and Imperva DDoS Protection were named in the same answer 109 times, of the 480 answers naming Cloudflare and the 114 naming Imperva DDoS Protection. In those answers Imperva DDoS Protection took the first choice one time and Cloudflare eighty-seven.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Cloudflare's lower tiers work well for basic volumetric attacks, but for sophisticated application-layer attacks, you will often need to upgrade to Enterprise or manually tune complex rate-limiting rules.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Over‑protective bot protection that flags legitimate users... When to be cautious: If your organization cannot tolerate even brief outages” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“look for established, globally distributed enterprise security providers (such as Cloudflare, Akamai, Imperva, Radware, AWS Shield, or Google Cloud Armor)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Custom (high) | Enterprise-focused sales model” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Imperva (strong L7 + network protection)—great if you need custom SLAs, but pricier and more complex for mid-sized setups.” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“though pricing is likely higher than the options above” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · soft negative
“Cloudflare or Imperva Incapsula are the most frequently cited cost-effective starting points” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Offers a powerful Data Security Platform. It is slightly more complex to configure than Cloudflare but offers granular control” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · alternative
“Imperva, Radware, NETSCOUT Arbor Cloud, and F5 Silverline are often selected when organizations want hybrid architectures” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.