AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Cloud and infrastructure › Object storage › Wasabi Object Storage vs DigitalOcean Spaces
Object storage · October 2026 Edition

Wasabi Object Storage vs DigitalOcean Spaces

One of fourteen models named Wasabi Object Storage first on the direct prompt; zero named DigitalOcean Spaces. Wasabi Object Storage was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and DigitalOcean Spaces by twelve and Wasabi Object Storage carries 54 labels and DigitalOcean Spaces 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Wasabi Object Storage

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

DigitalOcean Spaces

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share10%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate28%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels5426A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Wasabi Object Storage reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Backblaze B2 was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Backblaze B2 vs Wasabi Object Storage · Backblaze B2 vs DigitalOcean Spaces · Cloudflare R2 vs Wasabi Object Storage

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the object storage page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Wasabi Object StorageFirst choices, of fourteen modelsDigitalOcean Spaces
Direct101 against Wasabi Object Storage
Paraphrase301 against Wasabi Object Storage
Comparative00
Budget-constrained113 against Wasabi Object Storage
Scale-constrained001 against Wasabi Object Storage
Negative009 against Wasabi Object Storage · 2 against DigitalOcean Spaces
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Wasabi Object Storage and DigitalOcean Spaces were named in the same answer fifty-five times, of the 160 answers naming Wasabi Object Storage and the 73 naming DigitalOcean Spaces. In those answers DigitalOcean Spaces took the first choice three times and Wasabi Object Storage ten.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Wasabi Object Storage and DigitalOcean Spaces stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Wasabi Object Storage DigitalOcean Spaces first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Wasabi Object Storage on the left and DigitalOcean Spaces on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Wasabi Object Storage and DigitalOcean Spaces stood in it.

Wasabi Object Storage first, DigitalOcean Spaces not the choice

1 of 14 modelsDigitalOcean Spaces was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Qwen 3.7 FlashBackblaze B2, Wasabi Object Storage

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashCloudflare R2 alternatives: Backblaze B2, Wasabi Object Storage
Perplexity SonarGoogle Cloud Storage alternatives: Amazon S3, Backblaze B2, Wasabi Object Storage
Grok 4.1 FastBackblaze B2 alternatives: Cloudflare R2, Wasabi Object Storage
GLM 4.7 FlashXBackblaze B2 alternatives: Amazon S3, Cloudflare R2, MinIO AIStor, Wasabi Object Storage
MiniMax M2.5Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage alternatives: Backblaze B2, Google Cloud Storage, Wasabi Object Storage
Muse Glimmer 30Bno first choice alternatives: Amazon S3, Backblaze B2, Cloudflare R2, Wasabi Object Storage

Neither was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniAmazon S3 alternatives: Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage
Mistral SmallBackblaze B2 alternatives: Amazon S3, Cloudian HyperStore
DeepSeek V4 FlashBackblaze B2 alternatives: Amazon S3, Cloudflare R2
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Kimi K2Cloudflare R2 alternatives: Azure Blob Storage, Backblaze B2, Google Cloud Storage
GPT-6 LunaAmazon S3 alternatives: Azure Blob Storage, Cloudflare R2, Google Cloud Storage

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Wasabi Object Storage leads by fifteen points.
Wasabi Object Storage20%#2 of 9
DigitalOcean Spaces5%#4 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Wasabi Object Storage leads by eight points.
Wasabi Object Storage10%#4 of 9
DigitalOcean Spaces2%#6 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Wasabi Object Storage leads by twenty-three points.
Wasabi Object Storage23%#2 of 12
DigitalOcean Spaces0%#– of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Wasabi Object Storage

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Services to Avoid ... Wasabi Technologies | • 90‑day minimum retention per object” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Why avoid or extra cautious? 90-day minimum retention policy” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“Wasabi has a 90-day minimum storage commitment... This is fine for long-term archives but terrible for highly volatile temporary files.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“Wasabi - Best Overall Value ... Bottom line: For pure cost savings, Backblaze B2 or Wasabi will save you 70-80%” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“the best object storage service is typically either Wasabi or Backblaze B2” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Wasabi if: - You want the simplest, most predictable pricing” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about DigitalOcean Spaces

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Reported 5 GB object caps on some providers, and lack of object lock/WORM support on some of these services.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“DigitalOcean Spaces: Watch Out for Size Limits & Concurrency” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“the best choice is usually Backblaze B2 or DigitalOcean Spaces” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“If the company is looking for a cost-effective solution with good performance, providers like DigitalOcean Spaces, B2, or Hetzner could be considered.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Very small fixed budget: DigitalOcean Spaces starts at $5/month for 250GB storage + 1TB outbound transfer” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.