# Torq: how AI models rank it, September 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition. Named in 29 judge labels across 1 categories by 10 of 12 models. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/vendors/torq/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOAR platforms | 4% | 4 | 10% | 29 |

## What the models said for it

- "look at Tines or Torq. They make building and modifying workflows accessible to any tier-1 or tier-2 analyst." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, SOAR)
- "API-first/workflow-native platforms (e.g., Tines, Torq) | Easier integration, faster deployment, less lock-in" (Kimi K2, SOAR)
- "Many mid-market buyers are better served by no-code automation platforms (Tines, Torq)" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, SOAR)
- "Shift toward low-code/no-code platforms (such as Tines or Torq)" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, SOAR)

## And against it

- "Premium pricing ($150K–$300K+ typical for mid-market); better suited for larger enterprises" (Kimi K2, SOAR)
- "start at $80K+/yr (quotes for 5–10 users), unsuitable for limited budgets." (Grok 4.1 Fast, SOAR)
- "notoriously expensive, often requiring six-figure annual commitments" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, SOAR)

## Record

- Method: https://it-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://it-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as IT AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, it-ai-index.com.