# RiskLens: how AI models rank it, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition. Named in 27 judge labels across 1 categories by 13 of 14 models. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/vendors/risklens/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyber risk quantification | 2% | 12 | 37% | 27 |

## What the models said for it

- "One of the most established FAIR-native CRQ platforms... references enterprise-grade RiskLens as a benchmark tool" (GPT-5.4 mini, Cyber risk quant)
- "RiskLens - a pioneer in FAIR methodology, best for FAIR-based quantification." (Llama 4 Maverick, Cyber risk quant)
- "RiskLens is the gold standard for those who want rigorous, scientifically backed quantification... Caveat: Ensure you get the right pricing tier" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, Cyber risk quant)
- "it may have a steeper learning curve and higher cost, which could be a consideration for some mid-market budgets" (Mistral Small, Cyber risk quant)

## And against it

- "transparent pricing compared to most enterprise CRQ tools (like RiskLens or SAFE Security) that typically start at $25K–$200K+ annually" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, Cyber risk quant)
- "RiskLens (traditional FAIR implementation), manual FAIR assessments ... Heavy reliance on manual FAIR; resource-intensive" (Kimi K2, Cyber risk quant)
- "Enterprise tools like RiskLens, LogicGate, or Balbix are powerful but start at $10K+/year, so skip unless scaling up." (Grok 4.1 Fast, Cyber risk quant)
- "without the enterprise pricing and dedicated FAIR analyst overhead you see with RiskLens/Safe Security, Kovrr, etc." (Muse Glimmer 30B, Cyber risk quant)

## Record

- Method: https://it-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://it-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, it-ai-index.com.