# LibreNMS alternatives: what AI models name instead, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition. 232 of the 252 answers in the 1 category where LibreNMS holds a standing named it neither first nor as an alternative; these are the first choices those answers made. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/vendors/librenms/alternatives/

## Named instead, most often (every category and segment added)

- Paessler PRTG Network Monitor: 40
- Auvik: 22
- SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor: 21
- ManageEngine OpManager: 17
- Zabbix: 15
- LogicMonitor: 11

## Network monitoring and management

**Small business**: 75 of 84 answers did not name LibreNMS (LibreNMS is #10 of 12 at 0%).

- Paessler PRTG Network Monitor: first choice in 35 of those 75
- Zabbix: first choice in 9 of those 75
- Domotz: first choice in 8 of those 75
- ManageEngine OpManager: first choice in 6 of those 75
- Auvik: first choice in 5 of those 75
- Atera: first choice in 3 of those 75
- Checkmk: first choice in 2 of those 75
- NinjaOne: first choice in 2 of those 75

**Mid-market**: 73 of 84 answers did not name LibreNMS (LibreNMS is #5 of 12 at 6%).

- Auvik: first choice in 14 of those 73
- ManageEngine OpManager: first choice in 11 of those 73
- Zabbix: first choice in 6 of those 73
- Paessler PRTG Network Monitor: first choice in 5 of those 73
- SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor: first choice in 5 of those 73
- Datadog Network Monitoring: first choice in 2 of those 73
- LogicMonitor: first choice in 2 of those 73
- Domotz: first choice in 1 of those 73

**Enterprise**: 84 of 84 answers did not name LibreNMS.

- SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor: first choice in 16 of those 84
- LogicMonitor: first choice in 9 of those 84
- Cisco Catalyst Center: first choice in 8 of those 84
- Datadog Network Monitoring: first choice in 5 of those 84
- Kentik: first choice in 4 of those 84
- Auvik: first choice in 3 of those 84
- Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: first choice in 3 of those 84
- Ansible: first choice in 2 of those 84

Published under CC BY 4.0. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.