# Teramind vs Cyberhaven: which do AI models recommend for insider risk, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Insider risk management. One of fourteen models named Teramind first on the direct prompt; one named Cyberhaven. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/security/insider-risk-management/teramind-vs-cyberhaven/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teramind | 2% | #6 of 12 | 27% | 33 | 13 of 14 |
| Cyberhaven | 2% | #7 of 12 | 20% | 10 | 6 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Claude Haiku 4.5: teramind first (first choices: Teramind) (alternatives: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management, Varonis Data Security Platform)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: cyberhaven first (first choices: Cyberhaven) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Safetica, Teramind)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management) (alternatives: Teramind, Varonis Data Security Platform)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: Safetica Intelligent Data Security Platform) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Teramind)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Above Security, Safetica) (alternatives: Teramind, UpGuard)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither first, one named (first choices: Code42 Incydr) (alternatives: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Teramind)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither named (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management, Varonis Data Security Platform)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: Code42 Incydr, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management) (alternatives: DTEX InTERCEPT, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Safetica)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: Code42, DTEX Systems)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: Code42 Incydr) (alternatives: Above Security, Coro Insider Risk, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: Code42, DTEX InTERCEPT, Gurucul, Securonix UEBA)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: DTEX InTERCEPT, Microsoft Purview)
- Kimi K2: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr, DTEX InTERCEPT, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither named (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr)

## What the models said about Teramind

- "Teramind, Veriato, and Coro/Metomic, which are not recommended for large enterprises due to performance issues or limited features" (Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Teramind consistently draws the most mixed feedback of the major IRM platforms: Poor customer support" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Heavily employee-surveillance focused ... high privacy/HR risk for a B2B company" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, paraphrase prompt, hard negative)
- "Ideal for mid-market organizations (100-2,000 employees) seeking comprehensive employee monitoring for insider threat and productivity tracking" (Claude Haiku 4.5, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Teramind is worth evaluating if you specifically need endpoint activity monitoring and forensic detail, but it is more employee-monitoring-oriented" (GPT-6 Luna, budget prompt, alternative)
- "Consider it if you specifically need detailed endpoint/user-activity monitoring; assess the employee-privacy and governance implications" (GPT-6 Luna, direct prompt, alternative)

## What the models said about Cyberhaven

- "Potential concerns: Lacks breadth of cross-domain behavioral coverage and integration; may require additional tools" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "usually cost-prohibitive for companies on a limited budget, often starting at $25,000 to $75,000+ per year" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "If your primary goal is protecting IP (source code, CAD drawings, customer lists): Go with Cyberhaven." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Best Overall for SaaS-First & IP-Heavy Companies: Cyberhaven (Data Detection & Response)" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.