# Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs Cyberhaven: which do AI models recommend for insider risk, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Insider risk management. One of fourteen models named Proofpoint Insider Threat Management first on the direct prompt; one named Cyberhaven. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/security/insider-risk-management/proofpoint-insider-threat-management-vs-cyberhaven/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proofpoint Insider Threat Management | 4% | #4 of 12 | 19% | 27 | 11 of 14 |
| Cyberhaven | 2% | #7 of 12 | 20% | 10 | 6 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Grok 4.1 Fast: proofpoint insider threat management first (first choices: Code42 Incydr, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management) (alternatives: DTEX InTERCEPT, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Safetica)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: cyberhaven first (first choices: Cyberhaven) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Safetica, Teramind)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Teramind) (alternatives: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management, Varonis Data Security Platform)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management, Varonis Data Security Platform)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr, DTEX InTERCEPT, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management) (alternatives: Teramind, Varonis Data Security Platform)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: Code42, DTEX Systems)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: Code42 Incydr) (alternatives: Above Security, Coro Insider Risk, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: Code42, DTEX InTERCEPT, Gurucul, Securonix UEBA)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: DTEX InTERCEPT, Microsoft Purview)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither named (first choices: Safetica Intelligent Data Security Platform) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Teramind)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither named (first choices: Above Security, Safetica) (alternatives: Teramind, UpGuard)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither named (first choices: Code42 Incydr) (alternatives: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Teramind)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither named (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr)

## What the models said about Proofpoint Insider Threat Management

- "Potential concerns: Ecosystem dependency (Proofpoint suite), may be less suited for non-Proofpoint environments; session recording can raise privacy concerns." (GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Invasive monitoring (e.g., keystroke logging, screen recording in DTEX or Proofpoint ObserveIT) raises legal/ethical concerns" (Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "screen recording in DTEX or Proofpoint ObserveIT) raises legal/ethical concerns under GDPR, HIPAA" (Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Balanced mid-market pick: Proofpoint or Code42 Incydr for proven detection without overkill" (Grok 4.1 Fast, direct prompt, first choice)
- "my default recommendation would be Proofpoint Insider Threat Management" (GPT-5.4 mini, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "A solution to detect and respond to insider risks by providing visibility into user behavior across endpoints, email, and cloud applications" (Claude Haiku 4.5, direct prompt, alternative)

## What the models said about Cyberhaven

- "Potential concerns: Lacks breadth of cross-domain behavioral coverage and integration; may require additional tools" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "usually cost-prohibitive for companies on a limited budget, often starting at $25,000 to $75,000+ per year" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "If your primary goal is protecting IP (source code, CAD drawings, customer lists): Go with Cyberhaven." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Best Overall for SaaS-First & IP-Heavy Companies: Cyberhaven (Data Detection & Response)" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.