# Code42 Incydr vs Cyberhaven: which do AI models recommend for insider risk, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Insider risk management. Three of fourteen models named Code42 Incydr first on the direct prompt; one named Cyberhaven. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/security/insider-risk-management/code42-incydr-vs-cyberhaven/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code42 Incydr | 13% | #3 of 12 | 0% | 30 | 11 of 14 |
| Cyberhaven | 2% | #7 of 12 | 20% | 10 | 6 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Grok 4.1 Fast: code42 incydr first (first choices: Code42 Incydr, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management) (alternatives: DTEX InTERCEPT, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Safetica)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: code42 incydr first (first choices: Code42 Incydr) (alternatives: Above Security, Coro Insider Risk, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management)
- GPT-6 Luna: code42 incydr first (first choices: Code42 Incydr) (alternatives: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Teramind)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: cyberhaven first (first choices: Cyberhaven) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Safetica, Teramind)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management, Varonis Data Security Platform)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr, DTEX InTERCEPT, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: Safetica Intelligent Data Security Platform) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Teramind)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither first, one named (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: Teramind) (alternatives: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management, Varonis Data Security Platform)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management) (alternatives: Teramind, Varonis Data Security Platform)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: Code42, DTEX Systems)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: Code42, DTEX InTERCEPT, Gurucul, Securonix UEBA)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: DTEX InTERCEPT, Microsoft Purview)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither named (first choices: Above Security, Safetica) (alternatives: Teramind, UpGuard)

## What the models said about Code42 Incydr

- "Start with Code42 Incydr — it's purpose-built for the #1 insider risk in B2B (data/IP exfiltration), deploys quickly, and won't break the budget." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Balanced mid-market pick: Proofpoint or Code42 Incydr for proven detection without overkill" (Grok 4.1 Fast, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Code42 Incydr (now part of Mimecast) is widely considered the standard recommendation." (GLM 4.7 FlashX, paraphrase prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Cyberhaven

- "Potential concerns: Lacks breadth of cross-domain behavioral coverage and integration; may require additional tools" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "usually cost-prohibitive for companies on a limited budget, often starting at $25,000 to $75,000+ per year" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "If your primary goal is protecting IP (source code, CAD drawings, customer lists): Go with Cyberhaven." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Best Overall for SaaS-First & IP-Heavy Companies: Cyberhaven (Data Detection & Response)" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.