# Above Security vs Cyberhaven: which do AI models recommend for insider risk, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Insider risk management. Six of fourteen models named Above Security first on the direct prompt; one named Cyberhaven. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/security/insider-risk-management/above-security-vs-cyberhaven/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Above Security | 17% | #2 of 12 | 0% | 15 | 11 of 14 |
| Cyberhaven | 2% | #7 of 12 | 20% | 10 | 6 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Perplexity Sonar: above security first (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management, Varonis Data Security Platform)
- Mistral Small: above security first (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: Code42, DTEX Systems)
- Llama 4 Maverick: above security first (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: Code42, DTEX InTERCEPT, Gurucul, Securonix UEBA)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: above security first (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: DTEX InTERCEPT, Microsoft Purview)
- MiniMax M2.5: above security first (first choices: Above Security, Safetica) (alternatives: Teramind, UpGuard)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: above security first (first choices: Above Security) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: cyberhaven first (first choices: Cyberhaven) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Safetica, Teramind)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Code42 Incydr) (alternatives: Above Security, Coro Insider Risk, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: Teramind) (alternatives: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management, Varonis Data Security Platform)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management) (alternatives: Teramind, Varonis Data Security Platform)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: Code42 Incydr, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management) (alternatives: DTEX InTERCEPT, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Safetica)
- Kimi K2: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr, DTEX InTERCEPT, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither named (first choices: Safetica Intelligent Data Security Platform) (alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Teramind)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither named (first choices: Code42 Incydr) (alternatives: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Teramind)

## What the models said about Above Security

- "Above Security - Best for prevention-focused organizations, SaaS data security, quick deployment" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, scale prompt, first choice)
- "Above Security is widely considered the best insider risk management tool currently available." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, direct prompt, first choice)
- "the best insider risk management tool for a mid-market B2B company is Above Security" (Mistral Small, direct prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Cyberhaven

- "Potential concerns: Lacks breadth of cross-domain behavioral coverage and integration; may require additional tools" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "usually cost-prohibitive for companies on a limited budget, often starting at $25,000 to $75,000+ per year" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "If your primary goal is protecting IP (source code, CAD drawings, customer lists): Go with Cyberhaven." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Best Overall for SaaS-First & IP-Heavy Companies: Cyberhaven (Data Detection & Response)" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.