# SpamTitan vs IRONSCALES: which do AI models recommend for email security, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Email security. Zero of fourteen models named SpamTitan first on the direct prompt; one named IRONSCALES. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/security/email-security/spamtitan-vs-ironscales/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SpamTitan | 16% | #2 of 9 | 0% | 19 | 12 of 14 |
| IRONSCALES | 2% | #8 of 9 | 0% | 26 | 12 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Kimi K2: ironscales first (first choices: IRONSCALES) (alternatives: Abnormal AI, Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Barracuda Email Protection) (alternatives: IRONSCALES, Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration) (alternatives: Abnormal AI, Barracuda Email Protection, IRONSCALES)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Proofpoint Email Protection) (alternatives: Abnormal AI, IRONSCALES, Microsoft Defender for Office 365)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: Microsoft Defender for Office 365) (alternatives: Abnormal AI, Barracuda Integrated Email Protection, IRONSCALES, Proofpoint Email Protection)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Defender for Office 365) (alternatives: Abnormal AI, Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Defender for Office 365) (alternatives: Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Mimecast Email Security)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: Proofpoint 365 Total Protection) (alternatives: Abnormal AI, Mimecast Email Security)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Proofpoint Email Protection) (alternatives: Mimecast Email Security, Symantec Email Security.cloud)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: Abnormal AI) (alternatives: Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint Email Protection)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named
- MiniMax M2.5: neither named (first choices: Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Mimecast Email Security)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither named (first choices: Abnormal AI) (alternatives: Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither named (first choices: Proofpoint Email Protection) (alternatives: Abnormal AI, Barracuda Email Protection, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Guardian Digital, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, ThreatDown Email Security, Trustifi)

## What the models said about SpamTitan

- "The best email security platform for a company with a limited budget is SpamTitan, which is a budget-friendly spam and malware filtering solution for SMBs and MSPs" (Llama 4 Maverick, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Specifically mentioned as "budget-friendly" and "solid choice for budget-conscious teams"... For smallest budgets: Start with SpamTitan or Barracuda" (MiniMax M2.5, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Barracuda and SpamTitan are consistently highlighted as the most affordable and accessible options" (Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about IRONSCALES

- "prioritize Behavioral AI (like Abnormal AI or IRONSCALES) over signature-based gateways" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt, first choice)
- "For most mid-market B2B companies, I'd recommend IRONSCALES as the top choice" (Kimi K2, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Modern solutions (like Abnormal Security, Check Point/Avanan, Ironscales, or Sublime Security) connect directly to Microsoft or Google via API." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt, alternative)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.