# UpGuard BreachSight vs SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence: which do AI models recommend for DRP, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Digital risk protection. Eight of fourteen models named UpGuard BreachSight first on the direct prompt; one named SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/security/digital-risk-protection/upguard-breachsight-vs-socradar-extended-threat-intelligence/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UpGuard BreachSight | 22% | #1 of 11 | 5% | 21 | 13 of 14 |
| SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence | 6% | #3 of 11 | 5% | 19 | 10 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Perplexity Sonar: upguard breachsight first (first choices: Rapid7 Threat Command, UpGuard BreachSight) (alternatives: CybelAngel)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: upguard breachsight first (first choices: UpGuard BreachSight) (alternatives: Rapid7 Threat Command, ZeroFox)
- Mistral Small: upguard breachsight first (first choices: UpGuard BreachSight) (alternatives: Kaduu, Recorded Future)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: upguard breachsight first (first choices: UpGuard BreachSight) (alternatives: Netcraft, Rapid7, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFox)
- Kimi K2: upguard breachsight first (first choices: UpGuard BreachSight) (alternatives: Fortra Brand Protection, ZeroFox)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: upguard breachsight first (first choices: UpGuard BreachSight) (alternatives: Bolster)
- MiniMax M2.5: upguard breachsight first (first choices: UpGuard BreachSight) (alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future, ZeroFox)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: upguard breachsight first (first choices: UpGuard BreachSight) (alternatives: CybelAngel)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: socradar extended threat intelligence first (first choices: SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence) (alternatives: Flare, UpGuard BreachSight, ZeroFox)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Cyble Vision) (alternatives: BlueVoyant Sky, CrowdStrike Falcon, Rapid7 Threat Command, UpGuard BreachSight)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: ZeroFox) (alternatives: Bitsight, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard BreachSight)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither first, one named (first choices: Fortra Brand Protection) (alternatives: Kaduu, Recorded Future, UpGuard BreachSight)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Rapid7) (alternatives: Corvus Logic, Cyberhaven, Recorded Future, ThreatConnect)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither named (first choices: CybelAngel Core) (alternatives: Bolster, BrandShield, ZeroFox)

## What the models said about UpGuard BreachSight

- "What to avoid ... UpGuard BreachSight: $5,999/year minimum." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "UpGuard is the most frequently named fit for consolidated DRP + vendor / user risk outcomes without multiple point tools" (Muse Glimmer 30B, direct prompt, first choice)
- "UpGuard is frequently highlighted as a top digital risk protection (DRP) platform for mid-market B2B companies" (Mistral Small, direct prompt, first choice)
- "I would recommend UpGuard because: ✅ Specifically built for mid-market" (MiniMax M2.5, direct prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence

- "Broader intel, but more enterprise-oriented" (Grok 4.1 Fast, direct prompt, soft negative)
- "SOCRadar has gained massive momentum in the mid-market because it consolidates DRP, External Attack Surface Management (EASM), and Supply Chain Intelligence into a single, modular platform." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt, first choice)
- "My top recommendation: Start with SOCRadar's free tier to get immediate dark web and threat intelligence coverage" (Kimi K2, budget prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.