# NodeZero vs Horizon3.ai NodeZero: which do AI models recommend for BAS, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Breach and attack simulation. Four of fourteen models named NodeZero first on the direct prompt; zero named Horizon3.ai NodeZero. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/security/breach-and-attack-simulation/nodezero-vs-horizon3-ai-nodezero/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NodeZero | 12% | #3 of 9 | 0% | 14 | 9 of 14 |
| Horizon3.ai NodeZero | 2% | #7 of 9 | 8% | 12 | 6 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Qwen 3.7 Flash: nodezero first (first choices: NodeZero) (alternatives: Cymulate, Picus Security Validation Platform)
- Kimi K2: nodezero first (first choices: NodeZero) (alternatives: Cymulate, Picus Security Validation Platform)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: nodezero first (first choices: NodeZero, Picus Security Validation Platform) (alternatives: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Pentera, SafeBreach)
- MiniMax M2.5: nodezero first (first choices: Cymulate, NodeZero) (alternatives: AttackIQ)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Picus Security Validation Platform) (alternatives: Cymulate, Horizon3.ai NodeZero)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Picus Security Validation Platform) (alternatives: Cymulate, NodeZero)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: Cymulate) (alternatives: AttackIQ, NodeZero, Picus Security Validation Platform)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither first, one named (first choices: Cymulate) (alternatives: NodeZero, Picus Security Validation Platform)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: Cymulate) (alternatives: AttackIQ, Pentera)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: Cymulate) (alternatives: Pentera, Picus Security Validation Platform)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Cymulate) (alternatives: Weseth)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: Cymulate) (alternatives: AttackIQ, Picus Security Validation Platform)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: Validato) (alternatives: Weseth)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither named (first choices: Cymulate) (alternatives: AttackIQ Flex, Picus Security Validation Platform)

## What the models said about NodeZero

- "Choose NodeZero or Pentera if you want highly automated attack emulation that can quickly surface exploitable paths." (Perplexity Sonar, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "The best breach and attack simulation platform for a company with a limited budget is NodeZero or Picus Security" (Llama 4 Maverick, budget prompt, first choice)
- "the most cost-effective breach and attack simulation (BAS) platforms are NodeZero and Picus Security" (Mistral Small, budget prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Horizon3.ai NodeZero

- "more polished but exceed "limited budget" ... Avoid them unless you have funding." (Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "opt for "automated security validation" or highly-automated BAS vendors (e.g., Cymulate, Pentera, Picus, or Horizon3)" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt, first choice)
- "often cited as a strong BAS option for startups and small businesses due to its 30-day free trial and affordable pricing options" (Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt, alternative)
- "If you want to replace expensive manual penetration tests ... choose Horizon3.ai NodeZero" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt, alternative)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.