# CyCognito vs Detectify: which do AI models recommend for ASM, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Attack surface management. Two of fourteen models named CyCognito first on the direct prompt; zero named Detectify. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/security/attack-surface-management/cycognito-vs-detectify/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CyCognito | 6% | #4 of 12 | 26% | 39 | 14 of 14 |
| Detectify | 4% | #6 of 12 | 5% | 20 | 9 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Claude Haiku 4.5: cycognito first (first choices: CyCognito) (alternatives: Hadrian, Halo Security, Intruder)
- MiniMax M2.5: cycognito first (first choices: CyCognito, Intruder) (alternatives: Mandiant Attack Surface Management)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: UpGuard BreachSight) (alternatives: CyCognito, Intruder, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Tenable Attack Surface Management)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Intruder) (alternatives: Detectify, UpGuard BreachSight, runZero)
- Mistral Small: neither first, one named (first choices: Intruder) (alternatives: Bitsight, Detectify)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Intruder) (alternatives: Censys ASM, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, CyCognito, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: Intruder) (alternatives: Detectify, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, UpGuard BreachSight)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: Intruder) (alternatives: CyCognito, UpGuard BreachSight)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither named (first choices: Intruder) (alternatives: Cortex Xpanse, Mandiant Attack Surface Management, UpGuard BreachSight)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: Intruder) (alternatives: Bitsight, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, Rapid7 Surface Command)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: Intruder) (alternatives: Bitsight, Qualys)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Intruder) (alternatives: Rapid7)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management) (alternatives: Censys ASM, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Rapid7 Surface Command)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither named (first choices: Intruder, UpGuard BreachSight) (alternatives: Attaxion, Halo Security)

## What the models said about CyCognito

- "Also flagged as a criticized challenger (39% negative labels)" (Mistral Small, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Strong for automated discovery, but the search results point more toward complex environments than a typical mid-market default." (Perplexity Sonar, direct prompt, soft negative)
- "you do not need to pay for five-figure, enterprise-grade platforms like Palo Alto Cortex Xpanse or CyCognito" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "Validation separates the best. Platforms like CyCognito and Synack actively test whether exposures are truly exploitable" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "I'd suggest starting evaluations with CyCognito (if you want comprehensive discovery and have the budget)" (MiniMax M2.5, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Highly praised for autonomous discovery... Leaders like CyCognito stand out for validation beyond detection" (Grok 4.1 Fast, comparative prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Detectify

- "Per-domain pricing; can get expensive as you scale" (Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt, soft negative)
- "Detectify or Intruder: Excellent EASM tools geared towards SMBs and mid-market teams... low management overhead." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt, first choice)
- "Intruder or Detectify are the most commonly recommended mid-market-first EASM platforms" (Muse Glimmer 30B, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "Detectify is a Swedish EASM platform primarily geared toward small and medium-sized businesses" (Claude Haiku 4.5, paraphrase prompt, alternative)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.