# OWASP ZAP vs StackHawk: which do AI models recommend for API security, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, API security platforms. Zero of fourteen models named OWASP ZAP first on the direct prompt; zero named StackHawk. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/security/api-security-platforms/owasp-zap-vs-stackhawk/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OWASP ZAP | 10% | #2 of 13 | 17% | 12 | 10 of 14 |
| StackHawk | 4% | #8 of 13 | 5% | 19 | 12 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Wallarm API Security) (alternatives: Cloudflare API Shield, Harness WAAP, Salt Security, StackHawk)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Noname Security) (alternatives: 42Crunch, StackHawk, Wallarm API Security)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: Salt Security) (alternatives: 42Crunch, Wallarm API Security)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: Akamai API Security) (alternatives: Akto, Imperva API Security, Traceable API Security Platform)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither named (first choices: Aikido Security) (alternatives: Check Point CloudGuard WAF)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: Salt Security) (alternatives: Akamai API Security, Cequence Unified API Protection, Noname Security, Traceable AI)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Aikido Security, Data Theorem API Security) (alternatives: Imperva API Security, Traceable AI, Wallarm API Security)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: Noname Security) (alternatives: APIsec, Postman, Traceable, Wallarm API Security)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: Aikido Security) (alternatives: AWS API Gateway with AWS Shield, Salt Security)
- Kimi K2: neither named (first choices: Data Theorem, Traceable AI) (alternatives: APIsec, Beagle Security, Imperva API Security)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither named (first choices: Zuplo) (alternatives: Apigee, Kong Gateway, Salt Security, Traceable AI)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither named (first choices: Auth0) (alternatives: Cloudflare API Shield, Imperva API Security, Noname Security, Salt Security)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither named (first choices: Wallarm API Security) (alternatives: 42Crunch, Salt Security)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither named (first choices: Check Point CloudGuard WAF, Traceable AI) (alternatives: Akamai API Security, Cequence Unified API Protection, Noname, Salt Security, Treblle)

## What the models said about StackHawk

- "If you outgrow them, scale to affordable paid like StackHawk." (Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "Best Overall Value (Automated Testing): StackHawk ... widely considered the best balance of cost and capability for startups and SMBs" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt, first choice)
- "StackHawk - a developer-centric CI/CD DAST on a budget, with a free tier and paid plans starting at $59/mo." (Llama 4 Maverick, budget prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.