# SAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs Celonis Process Intelligence Platform: which do AI models recommend for process mining, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Process mining. Zero of fourteen models named SAP Signavio Process Intelligence first on the direct prompt; two named Celonis Process Intelligence Platform. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/operations/process-mining/sap-signavio-process-intelligence-vs-celonis-process-intelligence-platform/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP Signavio Process Intelligence | 3% | #6 of 9 | 30% | 47 | 14 of 14 |
| Celonis Process Intelligence Platform | 3% | #7 of 9 | 52% | 64 | 14 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Mistral Small: celonis process intelligence platform first (first choices: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform) (alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)
- MiniMax M2.5: celonis process intelligence platform first (first choices: Apromore, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform) (alternatives: IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: UiPath Process Mining) (alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining) (alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Everflow Process Intelligence, ProcessMaker) (alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither first, one named (first choices: Apromore) (alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate) (alternatives: Apromore, ProcessMind, QPR ProcessAnalyzer)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining) (alternatives: Apromore, KYP.ai, UiPath Process Mining)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate) (alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining) (alternatives: Mindzie, Minit, ProcessMind)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: ProcessMaker)
- Kimi K2: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Mindzie) (alternatives: Apromore, MEHRWERK, QPR ProcessAnalyzer)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither named (first choices: Mindzie) (alternatives: ABBYY Timeline, Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither named (first choices: Decisions, ProcessMaker) (alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Noxus)

## What the models said about SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

- "SAP Signavio | $150K–$700K/year | Heavy SAP-native positioning; enterprise price tags" (Kimi K2, direct prompt, hard negative)
- "SAP Signavio ($150K–$700K/year) are far out of scope for most limited budgets" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "$150K–$700K/year — only makes sense if you're deeply invested in SAP." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, direct prompt, hard negative)
- "If your stack is primarily SAP and you are planning a massive ERP migration: Choose SAP Signavio." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "SAP Signavio for SAP-aligned process mining + modelling + simulation with collaborative governance" (Muse Glimmer 30B, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "### 1. SAP Signavio – *Best if you use SAP or need end-to-end modeling*" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, paraphrase prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Celonis Process Intelligence Platform

- "What to Avoid (Unless You Have the Budget) ... Celonis | $60K–$100K/year + $40K–$80K implementation | Case-volume pricing adds up fast; opaque enterprise sales" (Kimi K2, direct prompt, hard negative)
- "What I would avoid on a limited budget: Celonis, IBM Process Mining, and similar enterprise suites" (GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "avoid enterprise-first tools like Celonis, which are often described as more expensive" (Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "The undisputed heavyweight market leader... If you have a highly complex, multi-vendor IT architecture and a large budget... Choose Celonis." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Celonis — The Market Leader ... Key Differentiator: Deep execution management with AI-powered recommendations and the broadest ecosystem" (Kimi K2, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Celonis remains the undisputed heavyweight, commanding a 31.2% market share through its sophisticated Execution Management System (EMS)" (Claude Haiku 4.5, comparative prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.