# Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs IBM Process Mining: which do AI models recommend for process mining, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Process mining. Four of fourteen models named Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining first on the direct prompt; zero named IBM Process Mining. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/operations/process-mining/microsoft-power-automate-process-mining-vs-ibm-process-mining/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining | 14% | #2 of 9 | 14% | 21 | 11 of 14 |
| IBM Process Mining | 14% | #3 of 9 | 27% | 37 | 14 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: microsoft power automate process mining first (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining) (alternatives: Apromore, KYP.ai, UiPath Process Mining)
- Perplexity Sonar: microsoft power automate process mining first (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining) (alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: microsoft power automate process mining first (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining) (alternatives: Mindzie, Minit, ProcessMind)
- Kimi K2: microsoft power automate process mining first (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Mindzie) (alternatives: Apromore, MEHRWERK, QPR ProcessAnalyzer)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Apromore, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform) (alternatives: IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither first, one named (first choices: Decisions, ProcessMaker) (alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Noxus)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate) (alternatives: Apromore, ProcessMind, QPR ProcessAnalyzer)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: UiPath Process Mining) (alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate) (alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform) (alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: ProcessMaker)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Everflow Process Intelligence, ProcessMaker) (alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither named (first choices: Mindzie) (alternatives: ABBYY Timeline, Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither named (first choices: Apromore) (alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)

## What the models said about Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining

- "Avoid or be cautious with Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining if you expect high volumes" (Mistral Small, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "I wouldn’t start with Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining if the budget is especially tight" (GPT-6 Luna, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "it can carry heavy add-on licensing costs (such as a $5,000/month tenant capacity add-on)" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Best for Microsoft-Centric Companies: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining ... this is the most seamless and cost-effective commercial option." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Best Overall & Best for Microsoft Ecosystems: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining (formerly Minit)" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt, first choice)
- "UiPath Process Mining or Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining are the safest bets" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, direct prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about IBM Process Mining

- "What I would avoid on a limited budget: Celonis, IBM Process Mining, and similar enterprise suites" (GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "~$4,250/month and enterprise-governance-focused — overkill for most mid-market teams." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, direct prompt, hard negative)
- "IBM Process Mining starts at ~$4,250/month — still expensive for SMBs" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "I would recommend IBM Process Mining if you want a process intelligence platform that is explicitly described as *tailored more to midsize organizations*" (Perplexity Sonar, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "For most mid-sized B2B companies, IBM Process Mining or SAP Signavio are the best recommendations." (Mistral Small, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "Mid-Market & Agile Specialized Tools (e.g., Apromore, Fluxicon Disco, IBM Process Mining)" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.