# IBM Process Mining vs UiPath Process Mining: which do AI models recommend for process mining, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Process mining. Zero of fourteen models named IBM Process Mining first on the direct prompt; two named UiPath Process Mining. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/operations/process-mining/ibm-process-mining-vs-uipath-process-mining/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Process Mining | 14% | #3 of 9 | 27% | 37 | 14 of 14 |
| UiPath Process Mining | 10% | #4 of 9 | 10% | 50 | 14 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- GPT-5.4 mini: uipath process mining first (first choices: UiPath Process Mining) (alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: uipath process mining first (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining) (alternatives: Mindzie, Minit, ProcessMind)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining) (alternatives: Apromore, KYP.ai, UiPath Process Mining)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining) (alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate) (alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining)
- Mistral Small: neither first, one named (first choices: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform) (alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Everflow Process Intelligence, ProcessMaker) (alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Apromore, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform) (alternatives: IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither first, one named (first choices: Apromore) (alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate) (alternatives: Apromore, ProcessMind, QPR ProcessAnalyzer)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: ProcessMaker)
- Kimi K2: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Mindzie) (alternatives: Apromore, MEHRWERK, QPR ProcessAnalyzer)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither named (first choices: Mindzie) (alternatives: ABBYY Timeline, Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither named (first choices: Decisions, ProcessMaker) (alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Noxus)

## What the models said about IBM Process Mining

- "What I would avoid on a limited budget: Celonis, IBM Process Mining, and similar enterprise suites" (GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "~$4,250/month and enterprise-governance-focused — overkill for most mid-market teams." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, direct prompt, hard negative)
- "IBM Process Mining starts at ~$4,250/month — still expensive for SMBs" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "I would recommend IBM Process Mining if you want a process intelligence platform that is explicitly described as *tailored more to midsize organizations*" (Perplexity Sonar, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "For most mid-sized B2B companies, IBM Process Mining or SAP Signavio are the best recommendations." (Mistral Small, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "Mid-Market & Agile Specialized Tools (e.g., Apromore, Fluxicon Disco, IBM Process Mining)" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about UiPath Process Mining

- "standalone mining feels limited. Enterprise pricing ($24K–$200K+ annually reported) and integration complexity for non-RPA users." (Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Verdict: Be cautious, particularly if you need robust data connectivity or accurate process analytics out of the box." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Caution: be cautious if you do not already use UiPath RPA, have messy/unstructured event logs and limited ETL capacity" (Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "I'd usually recommend UiPath Process Intelligence if you want the best balance of discovery, automation follow-through, and scalability" (GPT-5.4 mini, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "UiPath Process Mining | Automation teams, RPA integration | $25/user/mo | 4.4/5" (Grok 4.1 Fast, scale prompt, first choice)
- "Best overall for many mid-market B2B firms: UiPath Process Mining" (GPT-5.4 mini, direct prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.