# Apromore vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence: which do AI models recommend for process mining, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Process mining. Two of fourteen models named Apromore first on the direct prompt; zero named SAP Signavio Process Intelligence. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/operations/process-mining/apromore-vs-sap-signavio-process-intelligence/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apromore | 19% | #1 of 9 | 3% | 37 | 13 of 14 |
| SAP Signavio Process Intelligence | 3% | #6 of 9 | 30% | 47 | 14 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- MiniMax M2.5: apromore first (first choices: Apromore, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform) (alternatives: IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining)
- GPT-6 Luna: apromore first (first choices: Apromore) (alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate) (alternatives: Apromore, ProcessMind, QPR ProcessAnalyzer)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: UiPath Process Mining) (alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining) (alternatives: Apromore, KYP.ai, UiPath Process Mining)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining) (alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate) (alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining)
- Mistral Small: neither first, one named (first choices: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform) (alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Everflow Process Intelligence, ProcessMaker) (alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Mindzie) (alternatives: Apromore, MEHRWERK, QPR ProcessAnalyzer)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: Mindzie) (alternatives: ABBYY Timeline, Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining) (alternatives: Mindzie, Minit, ProcessMind)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: ProcessMaker)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither named (first choices: Decisions, ProcessMaker) (alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Noxus)

## What the models said about Apromore

- "Limited compared to commercial version; requires technical expertise" (Kimi K2, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Mid-Market & Agile Specialized Tools (e.g., Apromore, Fluxicon Disco, IBM Process Mining): Often much faster to implement, cost-effective" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt, first choice)
- "I'd recommend starting with Apromore's free Community Edition if you have some technical capability" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, first choice)
- "For most budget-conscious companies, I'd recommend starting with Apromore Community Edition" (Kimi K2, budget prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

- "SAP Signavio | $150K–$700K/year | Heavy SAP-native positioning; enterprise price tags" (Kimi K2, direct prompt, hard negative)
- "SAP Signavio ($150K–$700K/year) are far out of scope for most limited budgets" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "$150K–$700K/year — only makes sense if you're deeply invested in SAP." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, direct prompt, hard negative)
- "If your stack is primarily SAP and you are planning a massive ERP migration: Choose SAP Signavio." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "SAP Signavio for SAP-aligned process mining + modelling + simulation with collaborative governance" (Muse Glimmer 30B, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "### 1. SAP Signavio – *Best if you use SAP or need end-to-end modeling*" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, paraphrase prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.