# Apromore vs Celonis Process Intelligence Platform: which do AI models recommend for process mining, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Process mining. Two of fourteen models named Apromore first on the direct prompt; two named Celonis Process Intelligence Platform. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/operations/process-mining/apromore-vs-celonis-process-intelligence-platform/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apromore | 19% | #1 of 9 | 3% | 37 | 13 of 14 |
| Celonis Process Intelligence Platform | 3% | #7 of 9 | 52% | 64 | 14 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- MiniMax M2.5: both first (first choices: Apromore, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform) (alternatives: IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining)
- GPT-6 Luna: apromore first (first choices: Apromore) (alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)
- Mistral Small: celonis process intelligence platform first (first choices: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform) (alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate) (alternatives: Apromore, ProcessMind, QPR ProcessAnalyzer)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: UiPath Process Mining) (alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining) (alternatives: Apromore, KYP.ai, UiPath Process Mining)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate) (alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Mindzie) (alternatives: Apromore, MEHRWERK, QPR ProcessAnalyzer)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: Mindzie) (alternatives: ABBYY Timeline, Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining) (alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining) (alternatives: Mindzie, Minit, ProcessMind)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: ProcessMaker)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Everflow Process Intelligence, ProcessMaker) (alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither named (first choices: Decisions, ProcessMaker) (alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Noxus)

## What the models said about Apromore

- "Limited compared to commercial version; requires technical expertise" (Kimi K2, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Mid-Market & Agile Specialized Tools (e.g., Apromore, Fluxicon Disco, IBM Process Mining): Often much faster to implement, cost-effective" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt, first choice)
- "I'd recommend starting with Apromore's free Community Edition if you have some technical capability" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, first choice)
- "For most budget-conscious companies, I'd recommend starting with Apromore Community Edition" (Kimi K2, budget prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Celonis Process Intelligence Platform

- "What to Avoid (Unless You Have the Budget) ... Celonis | $60K–$100K/year + $40K–$80K implementation | Case-volume pricing adds up fast; opaque enterprise sales" (Kimi K2, direct prompt, hard negative)
- "What I would avoid on a limited budget: Celonis, IBM Process Mining, and similar enterprise suites" (GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "avoid enterprise-first tools like Celonis, which are often described as more expensive" (Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "The undisputed heavyweight market leader... If you have a highly complex, multi-vendor IT architecture and a large budget... Choose Celonis." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Celonis — The Market Leader ... Key Differentiator: Deep execution management with AI-powered recommendations and the broadest ecosystem" (Kimi K2, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Celonis remains the undisputed heavyweight, commanding a 31.2% market share through its sophisticated Execution Management System (EMS)" (Claude Haiku 4.5, comparative prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.