# PagerDuty vs Squadcast: which do AI models recommend for incidents, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Incident management and on-call. Three of fourteen models named PagerDuty first on the direct prompt; zero named Squadcast. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/operations/incident-management-and-on-call/pagerduty-vs-squadcast/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PagerDuty | 15% | #2 of 11 | 33% | 72 | 14 of 14 |
| Squadcast | 8% | #4 of 11 | 4% | 25 | 12 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Mistral Small: pagerduty first (first choices: Freshservice, PagerDuty) (alternatives: ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: pagerduty first (first choices: PagerDuty) (alternatives: Datadog Incident Management, FireHydrant, Opsgenie)
- MiniMax M2.5: pagerduty first (first choices: Freshservice, PagerDuty) (alternatives: Jira Service Management, incident.io)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: incident.io) (alternatives: PagerDuty, Rootly)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Freshservice) (alternatives: PagerDuty, Rootly, incident.io)
- Grok 4.20: neither first, one named (first choices: Freshservice) (alternatives: InvGate Service Management, Jira Service Management, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, PagerDuty, incident.io)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: incident.io) (alternatives: Squadcast)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: Rootly, incident.io) (alternatives: Jira Service Management, PagerDuty)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither first, one named (first choices: incident.io) (alternatives: PagerDuty, Rootly)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither first, one named (first choices: Freshservice) (alternatives: PagerDuty, Rootly, incident.io)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: Freshservice) (alternatives: HaloITSM, Hyperping, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, Rootly, Zenduty, ilert, incident.io)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither named (first choices: incident.io) (alternatives: FireHydrant, Freshservice, Rootly)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: incident.io) (alternatives: Freshservice, Jira Service Management)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named

## What the models said about PagerDuty

- "Avoid PagerDuty unless you truly need enterprise-grade features" (Kimi K2, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "The legacy heavyweight. Unrivaled for raw paging and alert routing reliability, but can feel clunky, expensive, and require a lot of manual configuration" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt, soft negative)
- "their paid tiers are expensive. Their "Starter" edition is free, but it lacks advanced reporting and custom escalation rules" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "the sweet spot is likely a modern "Cloud-Native" Incident Manager (like PagerDuty, Opsgenie, Statuspage, or newer competitors like FireHydrant or Phoebe)" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, scale prompt, first choice)
- "PagerDuty – Best for enterprise incident management, strong end-to-end orchestration, AI/automation, and Slack/Teams integration. Pricing higher, feature rich." (Muse Glimmer 30B, scale prompt, first choice)
- "Industry leader with 750+ integrations ... Choose PagerDuty if you need dedicated alerting, on-call management, and have diverse tooling" (MiniMax M2.5, comparative prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Squadcast

- "Squadcast (now SolarWinds) — Be cautious" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Squadcast is the cheapest credible option, with a free tier up to 5 users and Pro at $12/user/mo" (Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt, first choice)
- "The best incident management platform for a company with a limited budget is Squadcast" (Llama 4 Maverick, budget prompt, first choice)
- "I'd recommend starting with Squadcast (if you have under 5 team members)" (MiniMax M2.5, budget prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.