# PagerDuty vs Rootly: which do AI models recommend for incidents, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Incident management and on-call. Three of fourteen models named PagerDuty first on the direct prompt; one named Rootly. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/operations/incident-management-and-on-call/pagerduty-vs-rootly/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PagerDuty | 15% | #2 of 11 | 33% | 72 | 14 of 14 |
| Rootly | 5% | #7 of 11 | 3% | 33 | 12 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Mistral Small: pagerduty first (first choices: Freshservice, PagerDuty) (alternatives: ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: pagerduty first (first choices: PagerDuty) (alternatives: Datadog Incident Management, FireHydrant, Opsgenie)
- MiniMax M2.5: pagerduty first (first choices: Freshservice, PagerDuty) (alternatives: Jira Service Management, incident.io)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: rootly first (first choices: Rootly, incident.io) (alternatives: Jira Service Management, PagerDuty)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Freshservice) (alternatives: HaloITSM, Hyperping, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, Rootly, Zenduty, ilert, incident.io)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: incident.io) (alternatives: PagerDuty, Rootly)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: incident.io) (alternatives: FireHydrant, Freshservice, Rootly)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Freshservice) (alternatives: PagerDuty, Rootly, incident.io)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: Freshservice) (alternatives: InvGate Service Management, Jira Service Management, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, PagerDuty, incident.io)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither first, one named (first choices: incident.io) (alternatives: PagerDuty, Rootly)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither first, one named (first choices: Freshservice) (alternatives: PagerDuty, Rootly, incident.io)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: incident.io) (alternatives: Freshservice, Jira Service Management)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named
- Kimi K2: neither named (first choices: incident.io) (alternatives: Squadcast)

## What the models said about PagerDuty

- "Avoid PagerDuty unless you truly need enterprise-grade features" (Kimi K2, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "The legacy heavyweight. Unrivaled for raw paging and alert routing reliability, but can feel clunky, expensive, and require a lot of manual configuration" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt, soft negative)
- "their paid tiers are expensive. Their "Starter" edition is free, but it lacks advanced reporting and custom escalation rules" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "the sweet spot is likely a modern "Cloud-Native" Incident Manager (like PagerDuty, Opsgenie, Statuspage, or newer competitors like FireHydrant or Phoebe)" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, scale prompt, first choice)
- "PagerDuty – Best for enterprise incident management, strong end-to-end orchestration, AI/automation, and Slack/Teams integration. Pricing higher, feature rich." (Muse Glimmer 30B, scale prompt, first choice)
- "Industry leader with 750+ integrations ... Choose PagerDuty if you need dedicated alerting, on-call management, and have diverse tooling" (MiniMax M2.5, comparative prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Rootly

- "some vendors (like Rootly) have separate pricing for on-call, AI, and status pages that can balloon your bill" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, scale prompt, soft negative)
- "The Best All-Around Alternative: Rootly ... Choose Rootly if you want to improve your incident response processes and save money simultaneously." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "Actively consider instead: For modern teams, look at incident.io, Rootly, FireHydrant" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt, first choice)
- "Consider modern, Slack-native platforms like incident.io, Rootly" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.