# Portnox Cloud vs PacketFence: which do AI models recommend for NAC, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Network access control. Six of fourteen models named Portnox Cloud first on the direct prompt; zero named PacketFence. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/network/network-access-control/portnox-cloud-vs-packetfence/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portnox Cloud | 35% | #1 of 10 | 7% | 45 | 13 of 14 |
| PacketFence | 15% | #2 of 10 | 0% | 10 | 8 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: portnox cloud first (first choices: Portnox Cloud) (alternatives: Fortinet FortiNAC, HPE Aruba ClearPass, macmon NAC)
- Perplexity Sonar: portnox cloud first (first choices: Portnox Cloud) (alternatives: Forescout, Fortinet FortiNAC, HPE Aruba ClearPass)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: portnox cloud first (first choices: Portnox CLEAR, Portnox Cloud) (alternatives: Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: portnox cloud first (first choices: Portnox Cloud) (alternatives: HPE Aruba ClearPass, Ivanti Policy Secure)
- MiniMax M2.5: portnox cloud first (first choices: Portnox Cloud) (alternatives: HPE Aruba ClearPass, Ivanti Policy Secure, OPSWAT MetaAccess)
- GPT-6 Luna: portnox cloud first (first choices: Portnox Cloud) (alternatives: Cisco ISE, FortiNAC, HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: Aruba ClearPass) (alternatives: Cisco Identity Services Engine, FortiNAC, Portnox Cloud)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither first, one named (first choices: OPSWAT MetaAccess) (alternatives: Portnox Cloud)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: Cloudflare One, Jamf Zero Trust) (alternatives: Fortinet FortiGate, Microsoft Entra ID)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: Portnox CLEAR) (alternatives: OPSWAT MetaAccess)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Portnox CLEAR) (alternatives: Cisco ISE, Fortinet FortiNAC)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Portnox CLEAR) (alternatives: Cisco Identity Services Engine, HPE Aruba ClearPass)
- Kimi K2: neither named (first choices: Portnox CLEAR) (alternatives: FortiNAC)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither named (first choices: OPSWAT MetaAccess / MetaDefender NAC, Portnox CLEAR)

## What the models said about Portnox Cloud

- "Users experience performance issues with Portnox, finding it misrepresented and encountering frequent authentication problems." (Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Performance issues, misrepresented capabilities, frequent authentication failures, poor UI, non‑intuitive workflows." (GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Caution if you need rock-solid RADIUS or have complex identity federation." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Best budget-friendly dedicated NAC: Portnox Cloud, because it is cloud-native and emphasizes continuous access control without heavy deployment burden." (Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Portnox Cloud or OPSWAT MetaAccess give you device profiling, posture enforcement and guest/BYOD without standing up dedicated appliances." (Muse Glimmer 30B, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "Modern Alternatives: Agentless, cloud-native, or microsegmentation-focused (e.g., Portnox, Elisity for quick deploys without 802.1X pain)" (Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about PacketFence

- "a well-configured open-source PacketFence or a modern zero-trust network access (ZTNA) solution beats any legacy appliance" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt, first choice)
- "PacketFence offers the best value as it provides enterprise-grade NAC features completely free" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt, first choice)
- "I'd recommend starting with PacketFence (self-hosted) if you have some technical expertise" (Kimi K2, budget prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.