# Bunny.net vs KeyCDN: which do AI models recommend for CDN, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Content delivery networks. Three of fourteen models named Bunny.net first on the direct prompt; four named KeyCDN. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/network/content-delivery-networks/bunny-net-vs-keycdn/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bunny.net | 12% | #2 of 8 | 7% | 45 | 14 of 14 |
| KeyCDN | 7% | #3 of 8 | 12% | 25 | 12 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Mistral Small: both first (first choices: Bunny.net, KeyCDN)
- Llama 4 Maverick: both first (first choices: Bunny.net, KeyCDN) (alternatives: BlazingCDN)
- MiniMax M2.5: both first (first choices: Bunny.net, KeyCDN) (alternatives: Amazon CloudFront, Cloudflare)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: keycdn first (first choices: KeyCDN) (alternatives: BlazingCDN, Bunny.net, Cloudflare)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Cloudflare) (alternatives: Bunny.net, Fastly)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: Cloudflare) (alternatives: Amazon CloudFront, Bunny.net, KeyCDN)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Cloudflare) (alternatives: Amazon CloudFront, Bunny.net)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: Cloudflare) (alternatives: Bunny.net, Fastly, KeyCDN)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: Cloudflare) (alternatives: Amazon CloudFront, Bunny.net, Fastly)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither first, one named (first choices: Cloudflare) (alternatives: Amazon CloudFront, Bunny.net, Fastly, KeyCDN)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: Amazon CloudFront, CDN77) (alternatives: Azure CDN, Cloudflare, Gcore)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: Cloudflare) (alternatives: Amazon CloudFront, Fastly)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither named (first choices: Cloudflare) (alternatives: Akamai, Amazon CloudFront)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither named (first choices: Cloudflare) (alternatives: Amazon CloudFront, Fastly)

## What the models said about Bunny.net

- "It's often recommended to avoid for systems where uptime and reliability are paramount" (Mistral Small, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "No-SLA/consumer tiers (Bunny.net, KeyCDN): Avoid for critical/production systems due to weaker guarantees." (Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Bunny.net, especially for critical systems" (Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Bunny.net: A lightning-fast, budget-friendly, and modern CDN designed for startups, developers, and mid-market companies." (Llama 4 Maverick, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "Cloudflare or Bunny CDN are excellent starting points, depending on whether you prefer a generous free tier" (Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Zero budget but need video / large files: Bunny.net Standard. $0.01/GB NA/EU, $1/mo minimum, no request fees." (Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about KeyCDN

- "KeyCDN has a smaller network and less global coverage compared to larger CDN providers" (Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "No-SLA/consumer tiers (Bunny.net, KeyCDN): Avoid for critical/production systems" (Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "small providers — While some are decent, small CDNs often lack" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "KeyCDN is another popular choice, offering transparent pricing ... a good fit for mid-market B2B organizations" (Mistral Small, direct prompt, first choice)
- "The best CDN for a mid-market B2B company is Bunny.net, KeyCDN, or BlazingCDN." (Llama 4 Maverick, direct prompt, first choice)
- "I'd suggest starting with Bunny.net or KeyCDN for cost-effectiveness" (MiniMax M2.5, direct prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.