# UiPath Document Understanding vs Amazon Textract: which do AI models recommend for document processing, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Intelligent document processing. One of fourteen models named UiPath Document Understanding first on the direct prompt; zero named Amazon Textract. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/it-data/intelligent-document-processing/uipath-document-understanding-vs-amazon-textract/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UiPath Document Understanding | 4% | #5 of 11 | 24% | 46 | 14 of 14 |
| Amazon Textract | 4% | #6 of 11 | 14% | 28 | 13 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Mistral Small: uipath document understanding first (first choices: Rossum, UiPath Document Understanding) (alternatives: Flowwright, Nanonets, OpenText Intelligent Document Processing)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Nanonets) (alternatives: ABBYY Vantage, Amazon Textract, Rossum)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: Rossum) (alternatives: ABBYY Vantage, Automation Anywhere, Hyperscience Hypercell, UiPath Document Understanding)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Nanonets) (alternatives: ABBYY Vantage, Automation Anywhere, Rossum, UiPath Document Understanding)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: ABBYY Vantage) (alternatives: Amazon Textract, Google Document AI, Rossum, UiPath Document Understanding)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Rossum) (alternatives: Nanonets, UiPath Document Understanding)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: Nanonets) (alternatives: ABBYY Vantage, Rossum, UiPath Document Understanding)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (alternatives: ABBYY Vantage, Amazon Textract, Automation Anywhere, Azure AI Document Intelligence, Docsumo, UiPath Document Understanding)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither named (first choices: Nanonets) (alternatives: Affinda, Docsumo, Rossum)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: Docsumo, Nanonets) (alternatives: ABBYY Vantage, Rossum)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: Nanonets)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither named (first choices: Nanonets) (alternatives: DigiParser, Rossum)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither named (first choices: ABBYY Vantage) (alternatives: Azure AI Document Intelligence, Google Document AI)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither named (first choices: Rossum) (alternatives: Doxis AI.dp, Klippa DocHorizon, Nanonets)

## What the models said about UiPath Document Understanding

- "Avoid ABBYY/UiPath/Hyperscience unless you have dedicated IT resources" (Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt, hard negative)
- "Avoid enterprise platforms like ABBYY, Rossum, or UiPath for now" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "Avoid if you want simplicity: ABBYY and UiPath" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Best if you want IDP tightly integrated with automation/RPA... Need document extraction + workflow automation? UiPath." (GPT-5.4 mini, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Choose UiPath or Tungsten Automation if you need the document extraction to trigger an intricate downstream workflow" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "UiPath and Rossum are top choices due to their accuracy, scalability, and ease of integration" (Mistral Small, direct prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Amazon Textract

- "Avoid if you are non-technical: Azure AI and AWS Textract" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Be especially cautious if... custom extraction is developer-centric and that handwriting and language support need testing." (GPT-6 Luna, negative prompt, soft negative)
- ""Raw" Cloud Provider APIs (Without a Custom Interface) * Examples: Standalone use of AWS Textract" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "I would suggest starting with Google Cloud Document AI or Amazon Textract" (MiniMax M2.5, budget prompt, first choice)
- "If cost is the primary constraint, Amazon Textract is hard to beat" (Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt, first choice)
- "If you're already on AWS and need just extraction APIs, Textract's 3-month free tier and pay-per-page model is the cheapest to trial." (Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt, alternative)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.