# Amundsen vs Microsoft Purview: which do AI models recommend for data catalogs, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Data catalogs and governance. Zero of fourteen models named Amundsen first on the direct prompt; zero named Microsoft Purview. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/it-data/data-catalogs-and-governance/amundsen-vs-microsoft-purview/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amundsen | 4% | #7 of 15 | 33% | 12 | 7 of 14 |
| Microsoft Purview | 2% | #8 of 15 | 14% | 35 | 13 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Atlan, Secoda) (alternatives: Alation, Microsoft Purview)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither first, one named (first choices: Atlan) (alternatives: Microsoft Purview, OpenMetadata, Secoda)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: Atlan) (alternatives: Alation, OvalEdge)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: DataHub) (alternatives: Alation, DataGalaxy)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither named (first choices: Select Star) (alternatives: Atlan, Coalesce Catalog, OvalEdge, Secoda)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither named (first choices: Atlan) (alternatives: Alation, OvalEdge, Select Star)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: Atlan) (alternatives: Alation, OvalEdge, Secoda)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Atlan, OvalEdge)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: Secoda) (alternatives: Atlan, DataHub)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: Atlan)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Atlan) (alternatives: AWS DataZone, DataHub, Google Dataplex, OvalEdge, Seceda)
- Kimi K2: neither named (first choices: Secoda) (alternatives: Atlan, OvalEdge, Select Star)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither named (first choices: Atlan, Secoda, Select Star) (alternatives: Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, OvalEdge, data.world)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither named (first choices: Atlan) (alternatives: Alation, OvalEdge)

## What the models said about Amundsen

- "Avoid for Mid-Market: ... open-source like DataHub/Amundsen (free but needs engineering overhead)" (Grok 4.1 Fast, direct prompt, hard negative)
- "Amundsen (Lyft) — archived and no longer maintained as of 2026, so don't build on it" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "have lower license costs but require significant DevOps effort to install, maintain, and keep running" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, scale prompt, soft negative)
- "likely to be an open-source tool such as Amundsen or DataHub, which are suitable for on-premise environments" (Llama 4 Maverick, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Best ultra-lean choice: Amundsen" (GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Microsoft Purview

- "user feedback and reviews frequently highlight immense friction, spotty lineage, and high database scanning costs when trying to integrate Purview with non-Microsoft environments" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt, soft negative)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.