# Infisical vs AWS Secrets Manager: which do AI models recommend for secrets, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Secrets management. Zero of fourteen models named Infisical first on the direct prompt; one named AWS Secrets Manager. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/identity/secrets-management/infisical-vs-aws-secrets-manager/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infisical | 15% | #3 of 13 | 0% | 43 | 13 of 14 |
| AWS Secrets Manager | 8% | #4 of 13 | 10% | 60 | 14 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- GPT-5.4 mini: aws secrets manager first (first choices: AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault) (alternatives: HashiCorp Vault)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Doppler, HashiCorp Vault) (alternatives: AWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, Delinea Secret Server, Infisical)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Doppler) (alternatives: Infisical)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: Doppler) (alternatives: 1Password, Infisical)
- Mistral Small: neither first, one named (first choices: HashiCorp Vault) (alternatives: AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Doppler) (alternatives: Akeyless, Infisical)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Doppler) (alternatives: 1Password Secrets Manager, Infisical)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: Delinea Secret Server, HashiCorp Vault) (alternatives: 1Password, AWS Secrets Manager)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: HashiCorp Vault) (alternatives: AWS Secrets Manager, Doppler, Infisical)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Doppler) (alternatives: HashiCorp Vault, Infisical)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither first, one named (first choices: Doppler) (alternatives: AWS Secrets Manager, Infisical)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither first, one named (first choices: Doppler) (alternatives: AWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, Azure Key Vault, Google Secret Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Infisical)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither named (first choices: Doppler) (alternatives: HashiCorp Vault)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named

## What the models said about Infisical

- "Infisical Pro at $18/identity/month is often the best value for startups seeking affordable, developer-friendly secrets management with minimal operational overhead." (Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Infisical is often cited as the best open‑source choice for 2026 because it balances a generous free tier with strong features and a polished developer experience." (GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt, first choice)
- "My recommendation for tight budgets: Infisical or HashiCorp Vault (self-hosted)" (MiniMax M2.5, budget prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about AWS Secrets Manager

- "GitGuardian cautions that AWS Secrets Manager, GCP Secret Manager, and Azure Key Vault can create fragmentation if you operate in multi-cloud setups." (Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "AWS Secrets Manager and Azure Key Vault have had vulnerabilities... They may not suit multi-cloud environments" (MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Strong vendor lock-in—if multi-cloud or hybrid, cross-cloud access adds friction/cost." (Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "my default recommendation is: 1) If you're cloud-native and mostly on one major cloud: use the cloud provider's native secrets service. - AWS: AWS Secrets Manager" (GPT-5.4 mini, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "Best default for most mid-market teams on one major cloud: AWS Secrets Manager if you're mostly on AWS" (GPT-5.4 mini, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Already AWS-native and want minimal ops: AWS Secrets Manager is the pragmatic first step." (Muse Glimmer 30B, paraphrase prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.