# LoginRadius vs FusionAuth: which do AI models recommend for CIAM, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Customer identity and access management. Four of fourteen models named LoginRadius first on the direct prompt; zero named FusionAuth. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/identity/customer-identity-and-access-management/loginradius-vs-fusionauth/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LoginRadius | 12% | #4 of 14 | 5% | 22 | 10 of 14 |
| FusionAuth | 5% | #6 of 14 | 5% | 22 | 11 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Perplexity Sonar: loginradius first (first choices: LoginRadius) (alternatives: Clerk, Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID)
- Mistral Small: loginradius first (first choices: LoginRadius) (alternatives: Thales OneWelcome)
- Llama 4 Maverick: loginradius first (first choices: LoginRadius) (alternatives: Clerk, OneWelcome Identity Platform)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: loginradius first (first choices: Frontegg, LoginRadius) (alternatives: Auth0, Ping Identity)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: Frontegg) (alternatives: Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud, FusionAuth, Okta)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: Auth0) (alternatives: Clerk, Frontegg, FusionAuth, Microsoft Entra External ID, Stytch, WorkOS)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: Clerk, Frontegg) (alternatives: FusionAuth, WorkOS)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: Auth0) (alternatives: Clerk, Descope, LoginRadius, Microsoft Entra External ID)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Auth0, Clerk) (alternatives: Descope, LoginRadius)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: Descope, Frontegg) (alternatives: OneWelcome Identity Platform, SSOJet, WorkOS)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither named (first choices: WorkOS) (alternatives: Clerk, Frontegg, Kinde)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: Auth0, Frontegg) (alternatives: Clerk, Microsoft Entra External ID, Stytch)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Auth0, Clerk) (alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither named (first choices: WorkOS AuthKit) (alternatives: Auth0, Microsoft Entra External ID, Stytch)

## What the models said about LoginRadius

- "Organizations give up some features and control ... there aren't many connectors for third-party fraud prevention features" (Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Prioritize platforms with strong mid-market fit like LoginRadius (simplicity) or FusionAuth (cost-effective self-hosting)." (Grok 4.1 Fast, scale prompt, first choice)
- "LoginRadius is the managed-simplicity pick for mid-market teams that want CIAM without heavy engineering." (Muse Glimmer 30B, direct prompt, first choice)
- "LoginRadius is frequently highlighted as the best customer identity platform for mid-market B2B companies" (Mistral Small, direct prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about FusionAuth

- "Lower ongoing costs but requires more ops" (Kimi K2, scale prompt, soft negative)
- "Prioritize platforms with strong mid-market fit like LoginRadius (simplicity) or FusionAuth (cost-effective self-hosting)." (Grok 4.1 Fast, scale prompt, first choice)
- "Lowest total cost (no per‑MAU fees): Keycloak or FusionAuth (self‑hosted)." (GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Best overall for tight budgets: FusionAuth" (GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.