# Snyk Code vs Snyk: which do AI models recommend for SAST, October 2026

IT AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Static application security testing. Four of fourteen models named Snyk Code first on the direct prompt; two named Snyk. Page: https://it-ai-index.com/developer/static-application-security-testing/snyk-code-vs-snyk/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snyk Code | 14% | #3 of 10 | 2% | 41 | 14 of 14 |
| Snyk | 8% | #4 of 10 | 9% | 11 | 7 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Grok 4.1 Fast: snyk code first (first choices: Snyk Code) (alternatives: Semgrep, SonarQube)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: snyk code first (first choices: Snyk Code) (alternatives: CodeAnt.ai, Semgrep, SonarQube)
- Llama 4 Maverick: snyk code first (first choices: Snyk Code)
- Kimi K2: snyk code first (first choices: Semgrep, Snyk Code) (alternatives: SonarQube)
- Mistral Small: snyk first (first choices: Snyk) (alternatives: Aikido Security, Semgrep)
- MiniMax M2.5: snyk first (first choices: Snyk) (alternatives: Semgrep, Veracode Static Analysis)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: Semgrep) (alternatives: Checkmarx One, Snyk Code, Veracode Static Analysis)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Aikido Security) (alternatives: GitHub Advanced Security, GitLab SAST, Semgrep, Snyk Code)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Semgrep) (alternatives: Checkmarx One, Snyk Code)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: SonarQube) (alternatives: Semgrep, Snyk Code)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: SonarQube) (alternatives: Checkmarx One, Codacy, DeepSource, GitHub Advanced Security, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep, Snyk Code, Veracode Static Analysis)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither first, one named (first choices: Semgrep) (alternatives: GitHub Advanced Security, Snyk)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither named (first choices: SonarQube) (alternatives: Semgrep)

## What the models said about Snyk Code

- "Choose Snyk Code only if you already use Snyk Open Source/Container SCA...The limitation is fewer supported languages than SonarQube/Semgrep and no custom rule authoring." (Muse Glimmer 30B, direct prompt, soft negative)
- "I'd recommend Snyk Code as a top choice based on recent analyst reports (Forrester Leader), reviews, and pricing." (Grok 4.1 Fast, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Choose Snyk Code if your primary goal is developer adoption and you want a frictionless, speedy security tool" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "using a developer-first tool (like Snyk or GitHub Advanced Security) for fast, early feedback during coding" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Snyk

- ""We are forced to use Snyk–it's basically infuriating support and false positives... it's also insanely expensive"" (Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Snyk appears to be the most frequently recommended option for mid-market B2B companies running modern stacks" (MiniMax M2.5, direct prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.